| There
are many evangelicals that are very pleased that Ravi Zacharias, popular
Christian philosopher and apologist, had the opportunity to speak last
November at the Mormon Tabernacle in Salt Lake City to preach on the
unique claims of Jesus Christ. To many observers it was a strong,
bible-based speech that, in stark contrast to Mormon teaching,
presented the hard truth of the Trinity, Christ’s perpetual diety and the salvation that only
comes through Him. And while many evangelicals hoped that this kind of
presentation would open the eyes of many Mormons to their false beliefs,
many others wondered if it really changed anything. After all, Mormons
also believe in “Jesus Christ,” don’t they? So why would Ravi’s
promotion of Christ have any impact on Mormonism when they readily
accept that Christ is “the way, the truth, and the life”?
Sadly, I am of the opinion that
Dr. Zacharias’s speech, while noble in its intent, did very little to
change Mormon perception. If anything, Ravi’s visit only solidified
Mormon opinion that they are now being accepted by prominent
evangelicals as a legitimate part of the Christian community.
Why this bleak outlook?
A few years ago I had the
opportunity to interact with a member of a Mormon sect to discuss our
theological differences, just like Ravi had. It was my hope that I could
present the biblical understanding of “salvation by God’s grace”
as a way to combat the false teachings of works-righteousness that is
prevalent in the Mormon theology. Surprisingly, when I began mentioning
the word “grace” to her, she hardly batted an eye. “Why, we believe
in grace, too!” she replied happily. From that point on, any attempt
on my part to insist that Mormons did not believe in grace was futile.
She defiantly maintained her belief in grace, and that was that. In the
end we went our separate ways, still justified in our separate faiths. She
left with a newfound conviction that her Mormonism was just as biblical
as mine, and I left with a great deal of frustration and puzzlement over
her denial of the facts. So
what happened here?
Herein lies the rub. Yes,
Mormonism uses the word “grace.” But their definition is not the
same as the biblical meaning that evangelicals hold dear. It is a
watered-down, hollow understanding that simply turns grace into a
empty word. Yes, their sacred text, the Book of Mormon, speaks about
being “saved by grace,” but what is the rest of that verse? “By
grace we are saved, after all we can do” (2 Nephi 25:23).
Contrary to this Book of Mormon teaching, however, we
know that the Bible teaches that God’s grace is not conditional on our works; grace does not meet us halfway “after all
we can do.”
It is full and free, based on God’s sovereign will, and as Paul
argued,
“if it is by grace, it is no longer on the basis of works, otherwise
grace is no longer grace” (Rom. 11:6). In light of the apostle's
argument, therefore, the
“grace” of Mormonism is no longer a gift from God, but a reward or
payment due us, which is a concept that is completely foreign to
Scripture.
It is not enough, therefore,
for prominent evangelicals to simply speak to Mormons in common terms like
“grace,” “redemption,” and “Jesus Christ” that draw no
distinctions between the parties. Mormons, from
their perspective, use those words, too; and unless evangelicals draw a
line in the sand and force them to admit the stark contrast in our
respective definitions, then they will never be convicted of their
error. They need to be told point-blank, in specific detail, why their
“Jesus,” their
“gospel,” and their
“grace” is not the same as the Jesus, gospel, and grace that was
confessed and preached by the apostles in the early Church.
So while I can appreciate the
efforts of those, like Ravi Zacharias, who wish to reach out to the
Mormon church in love and gentleness, I believe that we must never fail
to reveal Mormonism’s blatant twisting of biblical terms which our
historical Christianity holds so dear. We must never fail to challenge them when they try to redefine and corrupt the “faith which was once
for all delivered to the saints.”
The following may seem a harsh
statement, but read it thoughtfully: If we fail in this fight to
secure the proper Spirit-inspired terminology of the Bible message when
confronting Christian cults, then we are no
longer confessing our faith in Christ and His gospel.
As Martin Luther wrote, “If I
profess with the loudest voice and clearest exposition every part of the
truth of God except precisely that little point which the world and the
devil (or Mormonism) are at the moment attacking, then I am not
confessing Christ, however boldly I may be professing Him. Where the
battle rages, there the loyalty of the soldier is proved; and to be
steady on all battlefields besides is merely flight and disgrace if he
flinches at that point” (my insertion).
Let us not mince words;
Mormonism is the enemy of God's truth. As contenders and soldiers of
the true faith, let us not back down from the battle before
us. To compromise our message for the sake of peace and unity is just as
deadly as desertion from God’s army in the midst of the fight against
the forces of evil. |